However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On August 20, 2017, at around 14:50 on August 20, 2017, the Defendant heard her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son’s son.

After all, the Defendant carried a dangerous article, and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Quantity (including the pening of errors in depth, the circumstances leading to the crime, degree of damage, agreed fact, the victim's father's desire to take the wife, and the primary offender, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the above circumstances and other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, and circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the pleadings of this case);