The purpose of the Customs Act is to contribute to the development of the national economy and secure customs revenues by properly imposing and collecting customs duties and customs clearance for exported and imported goods. Accordingly, any act of release which does not follow the procedures prescribed in the Customs Act should be recognized as an act of non-licensed export as stipulated in Article 181 of the Customs Act. Accordingly, without reporting to the customs collector, the court of first instance affirmed the judgment of the court of first instance which affirmed the judgment of the court of first instance which ruled that "an act of cleared through customs with the chief prosecutor of the Kimpo Customs Office" of the judgment is deemed a violation of the Customs Act by referring to two different Montreals of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is recognized as the judgment of the court of first instance, to return to the pre-divor of the judgment of the court of first instance without reporting to the customs collector, and it is not recognized that there is any illegality such as infringement of the law, error of law, etc., and that the argument of mistake of facts

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Seo-gu et al. (Presiding Justice)