Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant was an employer who had been engaged in beauty art business by using two full-time workers in the Dunused Room located in Ansan-gu, and was dismissed on September 30, 2013 through April 17, 2014 from the said workplace without notice on April 17, 2014, and did not pay 200,000 ordinary wages equivalent to the ordinary wages for 30 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The materials revealed in the records of this case regarding the assertion that E constitutes the proviso of Article 26 of the Labor Standards Act on the statement statement of the police with regard to E do not seem to fall under “reasons prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Employment and Labor as a case where an employee intentionally interferes with the business or causes property damage” under the proviso of Article 26 of the Labor Standards Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 110 of the relevant Act and Articles 110 subparagraph 1 and 26 of the Labor Standards Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;