However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, on June 2, 2020, mispercing that the victim D (e.g., 64 years of age) had expressed a desire to do so at C Content, which is located in Syman City B, on June 2, 2020, and that the victim’s table D was able to do so.

“The victim’s lux, which is a dangerous object with the bath theory, was placed in a lux, and the victim’s lux part was placed in the lux, and the victim’s lux part was placed in the lux, once.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous goods and carried them with an injury to the victim who is unable to know the number of days of treatment.

2. In light of the facts described in paragraph 1’s date and time, at the place, as shown in paragraph 1’s date and time, the Defendant took D with the background as indicated in paragraph 1, and took the Defendant’s day-to-day victim E and D’s day-to-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-day day-to-day day

Accordingly, the defendant carried a dangerous object labeling and assaults the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement of the defendant in court E, F, and written statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against D, and each statement of G;

1. Report on internal investigation (C standards analysis of CCTVs), internal investigation report (Attachment of photographs, such as parts damaged by each suspect), application of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to reporting on internal investigation (specific reporting on the part of Belgium assault);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury) of the Criminal Act, Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of special assault and choice of imprisonment with labor) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The negative circumstances are that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation are negative even though he/she had a record of criminal punishment for violent crimes.

However, the victims do not want to punish the defendant, and the defendant.