If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

No one shall deliver, sell, forge, imitate, or possess a trademark identical or similar to another person's registered trademark for the purpose of using or making another person use such trademark on goods identical or similar to the designated goods.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 2016. 9. 8. 18:00 경 속초시 C에 있는 피고인 운영의 ‘D’ 잡화점에서 정당한 권한 없이 대한민국 특허청에 “ 샤넬” 이 등록한 상표( 등록번호: 제 0309448호) 와 동일한 상표를 부착한 가짜 샤넬 가방 4개, “ 크리스 띠 앙 디오르 꾸뛰 르” 가 등록한 상표( 등록번호: 제 0046320호) 와 동일한 상표를 부착한 가짜 크리스찬 디 올 선글라스 3개를 판매 목적으로 소 지하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant infringed the trademark rights of the above trademark right holders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. 감정 의뢰 물품에 대한 진정상품 여부 확인서 (STU 한국지사), 상표 등록 원부( 샤넬, 크리스 찬 디 올)

1. The photograph related to the violation of the Trademark Act (the defendant and his defense counsel did not know whether a fake trademark is affixed to each product or not, and did not know that it was a crime of keeping the fake purchased for the purpose of sale.

However, in light of the recognition map of a trademark attached to a product held by the defendant, and the external appearance and quantity of each product, etc., the defendant can be sufficiently recognized that each product was stored for the purpose of sale even though he/she knew that each product stolens the unique height and shape of a trademark overseas, and the mere legal site does not affect the establishment and punishment of the crime of this case, and thus, the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion is not acceptable).

1. The indictment shall be prepared in accordance with Article 230 of the Trademark Act (including each registered trademark) regarding criminal facts and the choice of punishment.