When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On March 17, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would make payment within 10 days if he/she lent 2 million won to the victim,” as he/she was in need of money in the victim D’s residence, gambling, etc. in Suwon-si C, Suwon-si.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay it.

As such, the Defendant was granted two million won from the seat by deceiving the victim.

2. Around March 24, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay KRW 3 million to the victim KRW 1 million in total, if he/she additionally lent KRW 1 million to the victim, and KRW 1 million in total at the same time.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received one million won in the seat and acquired a total of three million won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of loan certificate;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;