A. The Defendant did not commit an assault by misunderstanding of facts against the victim D by driving off the victim D or by pushing himself on his hand.

B. The sentencing of the first instance court on the unfair sentencing (200,000 won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대하여 제1심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들, 특히 블랙박스 영상에 의하면 피고인이 집에 돌아가려는 피해자를 뒤따라가 그의 뒷목을 잡아끌며 시비하는 과정에서 피고인에게 달려드는 피해자를 양손으로 잡아채어 밀어 버려 피해자로 하여금 도로에 나뒹굴게 한 사실을 확인할 수 있고, 제1심 및 당심 증인 D의 증언에 의하면, 피고인이 피해자를 발로 찬 사실도 인정할 수 있어, 이 사건 공소사실을 충분히 인정할 수 있으므로, 피고인의 사실오인 주장은 받아들이지 아니한다.

B. In full view of the Defendant’s background and content of the instant crime, motive, relationship with the victim, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and family relationship, the first instance sentencing against the Defendant is too unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.