When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[criminal power] On November 5, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million from the Incheon District Court to a fine of KRW 1 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on December 11, 2015, a summary order of KRW 4 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Busan District Court’s Branch Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

On June 12, 2020, at around 22:45, the Defendant driven a DNA car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.042% in a section of about 200 meters from the roads near the Nowon-gu, Seocheon-si B basin to the roads in the front of Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the duty of prohibition on driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant's oral statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver, report on the circumstances of a drinking driving, and inquiry into the results of the crackdown on drinking;

1. Registers of driver's licenses, and car4;

1. Investigation report (report on the circumstances of an immigration driver);

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (verification of previous convictions), and application of each summary order statutes;

1. Article 148-2(1) and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the crime, the choice of fines (the defendant is punished for driving under the influence of alcohol in 2009 and year 2015) and the risk of recidivism is high since he again committed the crime of driving under the influence of alcohol in this case even though he was punished for driving under the influence of alcohol in 2009 and year 2015. However, the defendant is under the confession of and in depth against the crime in this case, and the defendant was not punished for driving under the influence of alcohol in 2015 and was not punished for more than two times after 2015, and there was no other criminal punishment except for the above fines, and the degree of fines shall be determined again by taking into account the fact that the blood alcohol concentration at the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.