When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 14, 2014, at around 02:55, the Defendant: (a) recommended police officers, such as those who were sent after receiving a report due to the problem of taxi drivers and taxi fares, in front of the exit area of 9:5 subway lines No. 158-85 subway No. 7 of the Gwangju-gu, Gwangju to pay and return home on a charge to the Defendant; (b) while taking a bath to the above C, C was able to flow back, and C was able to flow back to the left part of C’s drinking, thereby interfering with the legitimate performance of duties of police officers on the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes, and maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D statements;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 136 (1) of the Selection of Punishment Act (the selection of fines in consideration of the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, the fact that the injured police officer immediately after the crime was found, the defendant was the first offender, the background of the crime in this case, the age, character and conduct, the environment, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;