손해배상(산)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if all evidence submitted in the court of first instance are examined, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance
Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is that, except for adding the following judgments to the allegations emphasized by the plaintiff in this court, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.
2. Additional determination
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The construction site of an apartment that Defendant C received from Defendant B (F Co., Ltd.) (hereinafter “instant construction site”).
(B) an accident that falls from the 11th floor up to the 11st floor to the sprinking hole of the materials posing below that floor (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).
2) Defendant B, the subcontractor of the instant construction, is also the subject of management supervision at the instant site. Therefore, Defendant C is jointly and severally liable for the Plaintiff’s damage, along with Defendant C.
B. Among the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, there are evidence Nos. 4, 5, and 10 evidence No. 3 and 4 supporting the instant accident.
However, in light of the following circumstances, the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact of the instant accident, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit, as it does not need further review. In light of the following circumstances, the evidence presented by the Plaintiff is insufficient to acknowledge the fact of the instant accident.
① The evidence No. 4 is that the Plaintiff voluntarily prepared an application for medical care benefits (a detailed situation is written with no memory), and the evidence No. 5 is that of the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation, stating the circumstances of the accident on the basis of the above application.