If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is the representative of the complete-gu and miscellaneous retail chain B.

The defendant was not allowed to use a trademark identical with or similar to another person's registered trademark for designated goods without the authority to use the trademark.

Nevertheless, around August 3, 2012, the Defendant issued an order for the U. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. 960 U. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.

Therefore, the Defendant’s trademark right holder is infringed by importing the forged “hyst” U. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.s.s. using the same trademark on November 17, 200 (the expiration date: November 17, 2020) from the Korean Intellectual Property Office as the designated goods of No. 048155, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of statutes to the Trademark Act and subordinate statutes, such as a report on detection, a petition, a reply and a trademark register, a seizure protocol, and an appraisal;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and Article 93 of the Trademark Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 97-2 (1) of the Trademark Act that is confiscated;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;