전자금융거래법위반
All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is that each sentence (Defendant B: fine of KRW 5 million; penalty of KRW 8 million; penalty of KRW 3 million; penalty of KRW 3 million; and penalty of KRW 1 million) declared by the court below to the Defendants is too unfasible and unfair.
2. Each of the instant crimes committed by the Defendants is very socially malicious since the Defendants established a corporation without substance and opened a passbook in the name of the corporation, and transferred it to the operators of illegal sports Saturdays.
The crime was committed systematically, and the number of transferred approach media is high.
However, in full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendants divided the Defendants’ mistake; (b) the Defendants committed the instant crime upon the request of A and F; (c) the degree of participation in the commission of the Defendants is relatively minor; and (d) the Defendants’ age, sex, environment, circumstances leading to the commission of the instant crime; and (c) all of the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the commission of the commission of the Defendants, do not seem to be unfair and unfair.
Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the Prosecutor’s appeal against the Defendants is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.