2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50.

The Defendant owned Busan Shipping Daegu H building, and leased the 6-7th floor of the above building to the name poor in operating the “T” around January 2007. On July 27, 2009, the Defendant leased the same place to V operating the “U”. However, around November 23, 2009, the Defendant was aware that commercial sex acts are done in the above building upon receiving notification from the chief of the maritime police station that the said building was provided as a commercial sex acts.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while operating the “U” from around April 26, 2010 to April 29, 2010, leased the said building to those who engaged in sexual traffic business, and provided them to those who engaged in sexual traffic business by providing them with the operation of “I” from around December 201 to July 18, 2012 by continuously leasing the said building.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements in the suspect examination protocol of Defendant R concerning the prosecution

2. An interrogation protocol of Defendant D by the prosecution;

3. Investigative reports (Attachment of video recording CDs), requests for cooperation in investigation, meetings for cooperation in investigation, reports on investigation (Attachment of summary order) and reports on investigation (Attachment of written judgments);

4. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each lease contract.

1. Relevant Articles of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the occupation of a fine for the crimes: Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic.