beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.11.16 2016가단109861

대여금

Text

1. As to KRW 25,900,000 and KRW 5,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 25,90,000 from December 16, 2014, and KRW 3,000,00.

Reasons

In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including additional serial numbers), the plaintiff, who has completed the registration of credit business, determined and lent to the defendant 2.8% of the interest rate on September 15, 2014 and November 15, 2014; determined and lent 2.8% of the interest rate on October 15, 2014 and December 15, 2014; determined and lent 2.8% of the interest rate on November 14, 2014; 2.8% of the interest rate on June 14, 2015; 1.5% of the interest rate on June 14, 2015; 2.8% of the interest rate on December 15, 2014; and 1.5% of the interest rate on December 28, 2014; and 2.5% of the interest rate on December 15, 2015.

Therefore, the Defendant has the obligation to pay damages for delay calculated at the annual interest rate of March 28, 2014 provided for in the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users for KRW 25 million and KRW 5 million from December 16, 2014 (the following day after the payment of interest for two months and interest for one month is made), for KRW 3 million from October 16, 2014 (the following day of the lease requested by the Plaintiff; hereinafter the same shall apply), for KRW 4 million from November 15, 2014; for KRW 1.5 million from December 18, 2014; for KRW 5 million from December 30, 2014; for KRW 1,100,000 from January 8, 2015; and for each one million from January 8, 2015 to the date of full payment).

In regard to this, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff arbitrarily disposed of the security, prepared an agreement to the effect that he/she agreed to the disposal of the security on May 29, 2015, and delivered it to the plaintiff, and that the repayment was completed in accordance with the above disposal of the security, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the above assertion shall not

If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.