2. The judgment of the defendant is favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant made a confession from the investigative agency to commit a crime and seriously reflects the fact that health conditions and economic conditions are not good.

However, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is appropriate in full view of the following factors: (a) the defendant did not agree with the victim or did not compensate for damages; (b) the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of suspension of execution due to the same crime; (c) the crime of this case is a false statement that the defendant obtained the security deposit from the victim by defrauding the money from the victim even though the defendant is not a principal owner; (d) there is no special change in circumstances that may be considered in the trial; and (e) there are various sentencing factors that are shown in the argument of this case.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.