In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

The defendants and victims D are the only gap between the meetings of "F" in the smartphone "E".

From February 14, 2018 to February 04:00 on the same day, between the stairs of 1 to 2nd floor of the building G in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, the Defendants jointly brought a dispute between the stairs of 1 to 04:20, and between the stairs of 1 to 04:20 on the same day, Defendant A, who was taken by the consensus, etc. in the ceiling, put the victim in the following parts of the victim, Defendant C took the head debt of the victim into hand, 2 to 3 times the head debt of the victim, and 2 to 3 times the head debt of the victim in drinking, Defendant B took the face of the victim facing the head debt, and Defendant B took the face of the victim more than 2 weeks and suffered injury, such as the part where the victim needs to be taken about 2 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Results of internal investigation reports, 112 report processing table, related photographs, letters, investigation reports (on-site verification, surrounding CCTV verification), scam photographs, investigation reports (verification by the scam of the victim's dwelling stairs inside the stairs of the building), investigation reports (in the case of the victim's second floor related to the scam of the victim's dwelling, hearing of the victim's second floor), photo of the money in front, and viewing of CCTV images in neighboring buildings;

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel at the time of the instant accident, even though there was a dispute between Defendant A and Defendant C at the time of the instant accident, they did not assault the victim as stated in the judgment of the Defendant and Defendant C, and there was only one-time price of the face of the victim in knee as they occurred in the situation where Defendant A and Defendant C were able to turn over ente with the victim, Defendant C, and Defendant C, and there was only one-time price of the victim. As such, the Defendants asserted that there was no joint injury by the Defendants, and the following circumstances are acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the instant court. In other words, ① the statements made by the victim on the background and content of the instant injury