2. The judgment does not have favorable circumstances, such as recognizing the instant crime and reflecting the depth of the Defendant’s act, and having family members and visitors to the instant case’s act, leading up to a brush, and wanting the wife.

However, in 2002, the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime without re-acquisition of the license until several years have passed since the license was revoked by the Defendant.

In addition, even though the crimes are different types of crimes, they have committed each of the crimes of this case repeatedly during the period of suspension of execution, and considering the balance between the same and similar cases, the sentence against the defendant by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.