beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2012.12.06 2012고단131

공갈등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2012 Highest 131"

1. From around 2005, the victim C, who interfered with the business, agreed to pay KRW 30 million on the condition that the Defendant laid down 15 trillion won for the purchase of a golf course site, on the condition that the Defendant laid down the her shape F and the 15 trillion won for the purchase of the golf course site. However, the Defendant opposed to this reason that F decided the problem of the burial of the ancestor, including the her parents, without any distinction, on the ground that F decided the problem of the burial of the ancestor, the Defendant was willing to interfere with the victim’s construction work for the golf course building and the sale of the golf course membership.

Around 09:00 on June 10, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at the E golf course created by the victim in G in Sung-gun, Sung-gun, G around 09:00, the Defendant: (b) reported that the victim’s work was carried out in the Defendant’s father’s funeral room near the Defendant’s funeral room; and (c) caused the boom and died of the Defendant’s work that “I would have been why I would not carry out the construction work; (d) I would only die; and (e) I would not die; (e) I would have spathic spathic spath of H, and caused H to suspend the construction work.

B. On March 5, 2011, at the above golf course around 09:00, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim’s equipment director I’s mother’s operation in the Defendant’s funeral room with the Defendant’s mother’s operation in the management of booms; and (b) sought improvement; and (c) threatened I with “whether it would be why it would be flad with the death of flachis;” and (d) the Defendant’s discontinuance of construction by threatening I, such as flachising the flachis.

C. At the above golf course around 08:30 on March 8, 2011, the Defendant: (a) reported the Defendant’s father’s fluorial management work at the Defendant’s father’s fluorial room; and (b) fluored the Defendant’s father’s fluorial management work; and (c) fluored the front glass of the bluore with bluore due to bluorial bluor, and discarded the fluore; (d) fluored the Defendant’s fluorial death; and (e) fluored the Defendant’s fluorial construction work by up to 11:00 on the same day.