Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the first instance court, the court below found Defendant A guilty of the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediation of Commercial Sex Acts (excluding the non-crime part) among the facts charged in the instant case and the facts charged in the instant case (excluding the non-crime part) against Defendant B on the grounds stated in its reasoning. The crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts (Commercial Sex Acts) against the Defendants and the crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts (Commercial Sex Acts, etc.

It is justifiable to maintain the judgment of the first instance court.

In doing so, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the number of crimes and the collection of additional charges among the crimes of arranging sexual traffic, of violating the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as arranging sexual traffic, of joint principal offenders, and of arranging sexual traffic, and of violating the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as arranging sexual traffic.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.