When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 25, 2015, the Defendant was driving a set of automobiles owned by the Defendant on the front side of the Public Security Center in Seoul, a masse around 21:50, the Defendant was requested from SM7 passenger cars driven by the Defendant C to turn off the set. While there is the victim’s denial, child, etc., the Defendant was the above victim “dwart.”

r. Chewing. Chewing. Chewing. Death;

The victims were openly insultingd because they were so large as to be the “Chyp”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and D;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The main text of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not have expressed his/her desire to the victim, but according to each of the above evidence, the fact that the defendant expressed his/her desire to do so to the victim can be acknowledged. Thus, the above argument cannot be accepted)