However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant, at around September 14, 2018, did not undergo the above physical examination without justifiable grounds, even though he directly received a notice of the follow-up physical examination under the name of the director of the Gyeonggi-do Military Manpower Office, which caused the follow-up physical examination under the name of the Gyeonggi-do Branch of the Gyeonggi-do Military Manpower Office to undergo the follow-up physical examination for military service on March 14, 2019 and around March 13:30, 2019.

"2019 Highest 2058"

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall lend a means of access under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act to any third party, promising to receive compensation;

Nevertheless, at around 11:00 on February 27, 2019, the Defendant issued a proposal that “I will give loans after setting up a false transaction performance and improving credit rating, if you send a physical card.” On February 27, 2019, the Defendant sent one copy of the physical card connected to the bank account under the name of the Defendant E-bank (F) to the name partner through Kwikset service.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the means of access under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

2. On the same day, the Defendant sent a e-mail card connected to the said account after receiving the proposal that “I would make a false statement of transactions,” from a person in secret name, and the person in secret name misrepresented the victim G with H bank staff on the same day, thereby inducing the victim to transfer money to the above E-bank account by falsely concluding that “I will receive additional funds from another place, and transfer money to the account designated as a deposit under the name of deposit”.

The Defendant, at around 14:21 on the same day, received money from the victim who was deceiving him to the above E bank account from the victim, and kept it in custody on the same day. At around 14:21 on the same day, the Defendant, at around 14:21 on the same day, remitted KRW 6,00,50 to the I (J) account in the name of the Defendant, and at around 14:32 on the same day, voluntarily repaid his personal obligation after remitting KRW 99,50 to the same account.