However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 6. 10. 02:15경 청주시 흥덕구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 룸살롱 안에서, 평소 알고 지내던 사회 후배인 피해자 D(31세)이 술에 취해 자신을 껴안고 놔주지 않는다는 이유로 화가 나, 양쪽 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 수 회 때리고, 그곳 테이블 위에 있던 위험한 물건인 유리잔을 피해자를 향해 집어던져 그 유리잔이 깨지면서 그 파편이 피해자의 왼쪽 귓바퀴 부위에 맞도록 하여 피해자에게 치료일수 불상의 좌측 귀부위 열상 등을 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to details of hospital treatment);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and the result thereof, the court shall determine the same sentence as the order against the defendant, taking into account the following factors: (a) details of the crime; (b) details of the crime; (c) details and degree of injury; (d) relationship with the defendant and the victim; (e) smooth agreement;

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.