If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant, at around 19:20 on November 14, 2014, in the state of having weak capacity to discern things or make decisions due to a divided operation disorder, divided the contents of “D, E, E, E, E, P, Q, R-I, E, and E,” into [Separate No. 1] printed materials and “E, E, H, I, and B, in the form of L, E, E, E, E, E, and so forth” into the shape of “E, E, E, E, E (M, E,)” and the content of “E, E, E, E, and P, P, P, R, R, H, and H,” by openly pointing out the following facts: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 25179, Nov. 14, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 20220, Apr. 14, 1980>

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to AB by the police;

1. AC, AD, and AE Statements;

1. Each investigation report, each map and each photograph;

1. Each printed article;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to a written confirmation of hospitalization and a fact-finding statement (No. 1, 2).

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Statutory mitigation under Articles 10 (2) and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion about the defendant and his defense counsel under Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of the workhouses asserted that the defendant's assertion does not constitute a crime since the defendant alleged true facts for the public interest. However, according to each evidence of the ruling, the contents of the above inducements can be acknowledged as false facts, and the

The reason for sentencing appears to be leading to the repeated crime in the state of mental disorder, and the defendant is continuing in the appellate court due to defamation of similar laws, but the above appellate court is continuing to commit concurrent crimes.