When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a member of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Committee for Election Management of Apartments, and the victim D (the remaining and 56 years old) is a representative of the present occupant of the same apartment.

The defendant will change the heating system of apartment C to an individual heating system.

The reason that the opinion of the victim, the representative of the apartment tenant, should be the district heating, is against the victim and there is a conflict of opinion with the victim. I tried to dismiss all existing Dong representatives, including the victim, who is the representative of the tenant, and to present a matter to elect a new Dong representative by pointing out false facts about the victim.

1. On July 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00, around 2016, there was only one resident E, a general director of the occupants’ conference, and one occupant in the coffee shop in front of the settlement of the said C apartment; (b) the victim did not arbitrarily dispose of the remaining scrap metal after replacing the street of the apartment, etc. while representing the representative of the apartment house around 2005; and (c) did not arbitrarily bring about the Management Fund of the apartment house; and (d) in other words, there was no fact that the president replaced the street, etc. in 205 and sold the scrap metal.

D When the Chairperson is the chairperson of the past, he/she would bring about the apartment management fund if his/her personal business fund is accompanied by his/her own business fund.

There is a question of morality, and the reputation of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On August 5, 2016, the Defendant was in the second floor of the above C Apartment Management Office around 18:30 on August 5, 2016

C The fact that four persons, such as the chairperson F and the secretary G, etc., among the meetings of the apartment election management committee, have been located in the same place in 2005, did not have arbitrarily disposed of the remaining scrap metal after replacing the street of the apartment while the representative of the apartment building in 2005, and even though it was the fact that the head of the management office at the time had to collect it through the replaced company through H.