The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

At around 00:30 on August 12, 2015, the Defendants, at the front 106 dong-gu Seoul Building 106, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, 2015, had the victim D (the age of 51) and pet noise problems. Defendant B used the victim’s slurier reported and 2-3 slacker, and Defendant A had the victim’s slack part with the victim’s hacker.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A complaint;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Photographs;

1. Pursuant to the result of the polygraphy test of polygraphy (the victim D made a consistent and consistent statement with the investigation agency and this court consistent with the facts charged, and the above statement is supported by the injury diagnosis certificate, photographic description and image. Also, the aforementioned defendant's false response was observed as a result of the psychological physiological test of the defendant A. Accordingly, according to the evidence mentioned above, including the credibility D's statement, the facts charged in this case can be fully acknowledged) of the law applicable.

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act