If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On August 26, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car on August 17:40, 2015, while driving it along a four-lane road ahead of it through the intersection of wooden urban gas in the Sinpo City of Sinpo City of Sinpo City of Sinpo City of Sinpo City of Sinpo City of Sinpo City of Sinpo City of Sinpo City of Sinpo

Since there is a long distance crossing where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle by checking well the left and right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the Defendant neglected this, received the front part of the DNA car driven by the Defendant, which was driven by the victim C(42 years of age) who was directed the said intersection from the direction of the inspection station to the tin third-distance, according to the signals, due to the fact that the Defendant was negligent in driving the said intersection, from the front part of the DNA car driven by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury to the victim C, such as 6, 7, and sculpha, which requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment, and the injury to the victim E (the 41 years of age) who is the passenger of the above sculba, caused about 2 weeks of medical treatment, such as bones, bones, salt, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the injury suffered by the victim C in the reason of sentencing in Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not easy, the defendant recognizes his fault and reflects his fault, the victim E is relatively minor, the injury suffered by the victim E is relatively minor, and the defendant is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance.