beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.05.12 2014가합55044

약정금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 201, 201, the Plaintiff met D’s representative director of the Defendant Company with the introduction of C, a non-standing executive officer of the Defendant Company, around March 1, 201, and at that location D, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant Company to provide support for the Plaintiff’s orders for construction works on behalf of the Defendant Company. Accordingly, the Defendant Company issued a corporate card to the Plaintiff on September 201, and allowed the Plaintiff to use the name cards indicating the Plaintiff as the managing director of the Defendant Company.

B. 1) The Defendant Company entered into a contract for the construction of the Defendant Company: (a) the “E Corporation” awarded by Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd., Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant construction”).

On January 7, 2013, the Plaintiff participated in the bidding of the instant construction project, and entered into a construction contract with Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd., and with respect to the instant construction project from April 6, 2013 to December 31, 2015, with respect to the construction period from April 16, 2013 to December 31, 2015. (2) The Plaintiff directed the Defendant Company to prepare a bid estimate for the instant construction project as an executive officer of the Defendant Company as an eligible company, and after the Defendant Company was selected as an eligible company, the Plaintiff participated in the conclusion of the instant construction contract, such as entering into negotiations with Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd., with respect to the instant construction project.

3. From March 2013, the Plaintiff began to manage the instant construction as an on-site presiding officer of the Defendant Company, and around that time, appointed F as the on-site chief of the instant construction.

C. On June 20, 2013, the Plaintiff requested D’s representative director D of the Defendant Company to sign a written request for signature of the written request for signature of the written request for the execution of the agreement, but D rejected the signature of the written request for the execution of the agreement.

1..