When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a two-wheeled vehicle B CA110V.

At around 14:30 on June 24, 2015, the Defendant driven the above Oba, and had two-lanes in front of the Gibacle 1-dong, Gyeonggi-si, the two-lanes in front of the Gibacle 1-dong, facing the two-lanes of the Gibacle 1-dong, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, left straight at the speed of about 50 kilometers in speed from the direction of the Tinba-dong, Yangcheon-gu.

In such a case, the defendant engaged in driving service is an area in which a direct dust is prohibited, and since the signal is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive the steering and brakes in accordance with the signals by delaying speed and properly manipulating the steering direction and brakes through a thorough operation of the steering direction and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the left-hand turn from the left-hand side of the U.S. U.S. private taxi vehicle, which was driven by the Defendant at the right-hand side of the U.S. drive, in accordance with the new code, due to the negligence of violating the signal on the red signal and immediately left-hand.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E, who was on board the damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence, such as climatic and the left-hand sludge, requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C's written statement related to traffic accidents;

1. A manual of accidents of E;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A traffic accident blackbox, video CD;

1. Photographs of the damaged vehicle;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.