A. The punishment of the lower court (4 million won in punishment, and 40 hours in completion of the sexual assault treatment program) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination Doctrine, the fact that the victim wants to punish the defendant is disadvantageous to the defendant, and the fact that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, and considering all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unfluent so that it cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the above assertion by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.