However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. At around 02:40 on July 5, 2013, Defendant A, while drinking alcohol in Gnaart located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, on the ground that he was scambling the victim’s upper Defendant B (V, 29 years old)’s friendly Defendant B (V), he left the victim’s glass residues, which was a dangerous thing on the tables, and caused damage to the victim’s head’s scam which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the date, time, and at the place mentioned in the above 1.1. at the above time, there was an assault from Defendant A, and there was an empty be an open room for this part of this part, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim E (the age of 21) at the prices of the empty beer’s disease, which was a dangerous object on the table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of each statute of the medical certificate and the medical certificate of injury;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 25(3)3 and 32(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits, etc. of the Defendants’ Acts were not objectively dangerous. However, Defendant B is the first offender and Defendant A also does not have any criminal force other than a fine on one occasion and does not seem to have the nature of violence. The Defendants agreed with each victim to the extent that the victims are not subject to the punishment of the Defendants, the Defendants are against the Defendants, and all other sentencing conditions are considered as the order against the Defendants.