beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2018.11.14 2016고단420

전자금융거래법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 420 "

1. Except as otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act, no person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall borrow or lend any approaching medium, or keep, deliver or distribute any approaching medium in receiving, demanding or promising any consideration;

Nevertheless, on August 3, 2016, the Defendant offered that “The Defendant would pay 170,000 won for the 15-day fee per week from a person who was aware of the mobile phone text message from his/her name in mind,” and that “on August 4, 2016, around August 14:0, 2016, the Defendant sent Kwikset service articles who sent the above name in front of his/her Saemaul Savings Depository (Account Number: E, F) and corporate bank account (Account Number: G) with three physical cards connected to the access media connected to the Defendant’s name.

2. Embezzlement;

A. A. Around August 8, 2016, the Defendant came to know of the fact that the victim H deposited KRW 6.2 million in the above Saemaul Bank’s account (Account Number: E) in the name of the Defendant at the time of the Defendant’s criminal criminal act of Bohishing around August 13:40, 2016, and had the victim keep the said money in custody for the victim.

The defendant did not return the above money to the victim and embezzled it by transferring it to the company bank account (G) in the name of the defendant.

B. Around August 14:00 on August 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) informed of the fact that the Victim I deposited KRW 10 million in the foregoing Saemaul Bank Account (Account Number:F) in the name of the Defendant, in the case of the Defendant’s embezzlement of the Victim I; and (b) had the Victim kept the said money for the sake of the Victim.

The defendant did not return the above money to the victim and embezzled it by transferring it to the above corporate bank account (G) in the name of the defendant.

"2017 Highest 125"

1. On April 2016, the Defendant related to the failure to pay the construction cost is the victim L at the K Office located in the jurisdiction of the Sincho-si of Sucho-si on April 2016.