beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.05.11 2016고단8386

사기등

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

(2).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants conspired to obtain a non-exclusive loan from financial rights on the ground that they were indicted by G, H, I (a separate judgment and final judgment), J, K, and false lessees.

1. Defendant A, D, and L jointly committed the crime is the wife of N, an owner of 104 dong 102 dong 102, Busan, which provided the above real estate for the purpose of using it for the illegal loan. Defendant A was aware that the above H seeks a false tenant for the illegal loan of the pre-sale apartment loan, and L was a person who introduced Defendant A to H with the knowledge that the above H want to obtain a false tenant for the illegal loan of the deposit money for lease on a deposit basis. Defendants and L were to receive KRW 10 million from H, etc. in return for the participation in the above illegal loan.

Defendant

D, even though Defendant A did not have a pre-sale of apartment in the husband’s name, Defendant A made at will a letter of delegation with N, and made a false lease contract.

Defendant

A, even though there was no fact that the above apartment was leased around June 2014, H and Defendant D created documents necessary for the loan, such as a deposit of KRW 80 million for the above apartment, and a false real estate lease contract with the lease term of two years, and submitted the above documents to the employees in charge of the bank loans and applied for the loan at the point where J and L around June 2014, the injured Korean National Bank D Co., Ltd. is Chungcheong for the loan.

In collusion with L, H, J, etc., the Defendants deceptioned the victim as above, and obtained the delivery of KRW 60 million from the victim on June 10, 2014 as a full-time loan.

2. Defendant A and B conspired with H and I to receive KRW 2 million in return for an application for a loan as a false tenant and received KRW 2 million in return for the application for a loan as a false tenant.

Defendant

On June 26, 2014, A was entrusted with the name of 103, 502 of the O apartment of Busan-gu Busan-do at H’s request, and I was introduced to Defendant B, who is a false tenant, and H.

Defendant .