2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On June 13, 1985, the Plaintiff joined B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Nonindicted Company”) and worked for 10 years in the process of injecting the troke for 18 years, and continued to work for more than 18 years in the process of injecting the fluor, due to the characteristics of the Plaintiff’s work, and continued to work on holidays to meet the production quantity, and there was a pain on the part of the fluor when the fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor.

B. On March 31, 2014, the Defendant rejected the instant injury and disease on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the instant injury and the business of the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

Accordingly, the plaintiff filed a review and a request for review, but all of which were dismissed.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3, 4, and 5's statements, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was conducted with repeated shoulder burden while working in the 18th year in the fluor he had been on duty, and as such, the instant injury and disease occurred or rapidly aggravated due to these duties, proximate causal relation is acknowledged between the duties of the instant injury and the instant injury and injury.

Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case on a different premise is unlawful.

B. Facts 1) The Plaintiff entered the non-party company on June 13, 1985, and was in charge of three tons from the heat control process from September 15, 1985 to March 1, 1995. The Plaintiff was in charge of three tons from the heat control process in the short section, and the LP4B from March 1, 1995 to August 31, 2010.