However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant issued a certificate of tax payment, which is a documentary evidence for the submission of a bid to the recycling company of the collection company of the non-Yecheon-gu D apartment in Sinpo City, to the operator of the "C" recycling collection company in Sinpo City B.

1. On November 24, 2015, the Defendant forged official document: (a) printed the paper paper in the column of the date of issuance of the certificate of tax payment issued in advance; (b) printed it on the paper paper column of the validity period, “No. 25, 2015,” and copied it, and forged one copy of the certificate of tax payment under the name of the head of the Silung Tax Office, which is the official document, for the purpose of exercising it.

2. On November 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) exercised the forged official document using a false document as if it were a document that had been duly formed by the employees of the apartment management office who knew of such forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on a forged tax payment certificate;

1. Relevant Article 225 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 225 of the Official Document), Article 229 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of forged Official Document), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Crimes No. 1 in the sentencing guidelines [the scope of recommendations] in the mitigated area (4 months to 1 year) where social risks have not been realized because the ultimate objective of the crimes was not achieved, such as fabrication, alteration, etc. of public documents, etc. [the scope of punishment] in the mitigated area (4 months to 1 year) of the mitigated area (the scope of recommendations] in the mitigated area (4 months to 1 year), in case where social risks have not been realized because of the failure to achieve the ultimate objective of the crimes, such as public documents, etc. (the scope of recommendations] in the mitigated area (4 months to 1 year), in the mitigated area (the person who has been specially mitigated) (the person who has failed to achieve the ultimate objective of the crimes, the final sentencing scope according to multiple aggravated crimes: April to January:

2. The circumstances under which the sentence of sentence is rendered and other ages of the accused.