도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a man of Vietnamese nationality who is an illegal Stayer.
1. On April 13, 2014, Defendant 2 was under the influence of alcohol of 0.081% in blood alcohol concentration around April 23, 2014, and Defendant 3 driven C Leba car at the section of about 800 meters in front of Samsung Cown, which was in the blue-dong, at the time of Cheong-dong without a vehicle driver’s license, to the roads in front of the Cheongban-dong, and in front of the Cheongban area located in the same Dong.
2. In order to conceal the fact that the Defendant was discovered while driving a drinking or without a license as stated in paragraph (1) and was aware of the fact that he was an illegal aliens, the Defendant was willing to engage in a false act with “E”, which is a foreigner qualified to stay in law, who was the passenger of the said vehicle, known by Vietnamese Women D, who was the passenger of the said vehicle.
On April 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) while being under investigation by suspicion of driving alcohol and without a license in G District in the G DistrictF at Dacheon-si on April 23:10, 2014, stated, without authority, the “E” in each signature column of the certificate of arrest of flagrant offender, the report of detection of drinking drivers, and the circumstantial statement of drinking drivers, affixed a seal on the side, affixed it, and exercised it to the police officer in charge of being aware of the fact that the forged signature was authentic.
B. On April 14, 2014, around 10:24, the Defendant stated “E” in the signature column of the suspect examination protocol at the office of the Incheon Police Station Traffic Investigation Team at Incheon-si, and affixed the seal on the side, and thereafter, the Defendant exercised it to the police officer in charge of not knowing that the forged signature was authentic.
As a result, the Defendant forged each signature of the identification certificate of flagrant offender, the identification report of the driver, the circumstantial statement of the driver, and the suspect interrogation protocol, and exercised each signature.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;