When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

On November 8, 2016, the Defendant called the employee C in charge of the victim B, a company, to pay KRW 10,070,000 to the Defendant until March 2017, if he sent the organic fertilizer 1,350 to credit.

“A false representation was made.”

However, at that time, the Defendant was expected to suspend business on December 12, 199, which was 57,000 won after the month when the Defendant’s operation D had no particular income or property. Moreover, even if profits accrued from selling fertilizers 1,350 delivered by the injured party in the amount of KRW 57,000,000, the Defendant thought that it would be used as personal debt repayment, etc., and there was no intention or ability to pay the amount to the victim.

On November 9, 2016, the Defendant obtained from the injured party the delivery of 1,350 dissemination of organic fertilizer equivalent to KRW 10,070,000 from D’s operation of the Defendant located in Jung-Eup at Jung-Eup.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes requesting cooperation in investigation reports (Submission of suspect data), investigation reports (examination of evidential documents), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing of the instant crime, the contents and circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the degree of profits the Defendant acquired, the fact that no damage has yet been recovered until now, and other factors for sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, criminal record, family relation, environment, etc., shall be comprehensively taken into account and determined as ordered.