The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of fraud on March 24, 2010 among the facts charged in the instant case.

In doing so, there is an error of misapprehending the law of logic and experience and exceeding the limit of free evaluation of evidence or misapprehending the legal principles as to joint principal offenders.

subsection (b) of this section.

In addition, according to Article 383 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal on the grounds of an unfair sentencing shall be allowed only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years is pronounced.

In this case where a more minor punishment is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.