beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.11.28 2014고정786

업무방해등

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant’s obstruction of business (1) from February 1, 2014 to the same year

3. From February 26, 2014 to February 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) installed a cateral vehicle on the front of the Dok-gun, Jeonnam-gun; (b) installed a cateral vehicle on the ground that the victim E (55 years of age, female) entered the said road and used the said road within approximately 300 meters within a 300-meter radius; and (c) installed a steel net and pents connected to the previous road at the above place to the extent of 1m20cm from February 26, 2014 to March 5, 2014; and (c) the Defendant installed the steel net and pents installed at the above place as referred to in paragraph (2) above at a 30-meter limit of the pents, etc. so that each construction equipment and vehicle does not pass through the said road, thereby obstructing the victim’s new construction of the said road by force.

B. A general traffic obstruction (1) The Defendant from February 1, 2014 to the same year on the grounds as above.

3. From February 26, 2014 to February 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) left the burging vehicle on the side while leaving the burging vehicle on the side; (b) installed by connecting the wire-made nets and pents to the point of 20cc within the limit of 1m of the existing road at the said place from February 26, 2014 to the point of 20m of the same month; and (c) around March 5, 2014, the Defendant interfered with traffic by preventing each construction equipment, vehicle from passing along the cirthing, etc., of the steel-made nets and pents installed at the said place.

2. Determination and conclusion

A. The evidence duly adopted and completed the investigation by this Court, in particular, the witness G’s partial statement, the witness H’s legal statement, each statement of road use written between the defendant and the injured party (Evidence 3-1, 2-3-3-5), and each statement of content certification (Evidence 3-5-5) sent by the defendant to the injured party, respectively, and the result of the on-site inspection by this Court.