When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the chairperson of the second old union and the victim D shall be the chairperson of the current C Trade Union.

The Defendant, on May 15, 2014, posted a false statement on the internal computer network bulletin board used by C employees, stating that “10 persons who need to take place by the D chairperson,” under the title “The reason why D chairperson does not call an extraordinary meeting,” thereby undermining the honor of the victim as if the victim intimidations its members by posting a false statement on “one-way imprisonment”, and thereby impairing the honor of the victim as if the victim threatens its members. ② Promotion of the union members should take advantage of loyalty, exclusion from promotion, exclusion from promotion, and exclusion from the issuance of the evasion department if the union oppose the union members, etc., thereby undermining the victim’s personal pressure. ③ At the time of signing the request for convening an extraordinary meeting, the Defendant posted a false statement on the statement on the statement board of the internal computer network bulletin used by C employees, thereby impairing the honor of the victim as if the victim was unable to convene the extraordinary meeting, and ④ violates the victim’s reputation by putting a false statement on the victim’s personal network and membership fees, etc. due to disrupt the use of the E union.

As if withdrawn, false writing was posted, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness D, F, G, H, I, J, and K;

1. Each legal statement of witness L and M in part;

1. Internal bulletin board;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel, such as the response to the C Trade Union request, the answer to the ten reasons why the D chairman must take place, and the Defendant posted the same article as the criminal facts stated in the judgment at the time of the instant case. However, this is all true and the above article was posted for the public interest, so the illegality is excluded pursuant to Article 310 of the Criminal Act. However, in full view of the macroscopic evidence, it is recognized that the Defendant’s reputation by pointing out false facts, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation.