손해배상(의)
1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial are dismissed, respectively.
2. After an appeal is filed.
In light of the above legal principles, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the G Hospital on December 19, 2012 is deemed to have been improved to a considerable part of the given conditions. Moreover, the first instance court and the first instance court compared the Plaintiff’s past records before and after the instant surgery, and there is no particular difference between the Plaintiff’s left side and the first instance court’s opinion that the Plaintiff’s past records before and after the instant surgery did not change, and that the Plaintiff’s testimony response to the request for the medical record appraisal for the head of the Seoul University Hospital at the end of the first instance, the Plaintiff’s first instance court’s first instance court’s response to the request for the medical record appraisal for the head of the relevant Seoul University Hospital at the end of the first instance, and that the appraisal responding to the inquiry on the head of the Korea University Hospital at the time of the instant surgery is recognized as a causal relationship between the instant surgery and the lack of satisfaction and scarcity.
Part A can be recognized as a causal relationship with the instant surgery, and as a result of the evaluation of the gravity of the Plaintiff’s forces to the left-hand side * In the case of physical examination of the first instance court after the instant surgery, when the entrance into the right-hand side of the Plaintiff, it is possible to see that the movement of the Plaintiff cannot be seen as having been able to be able to open to the right-hand side to the extent that it would be impossible to see that the movement of the first instance court after the instant surgery would be 3/555 of the physical examination of the first instance court after the instant surgery, and that the movement of the Plaintiff cannot be seen as having been able to open to the right-hand side of the Plaintiff at all when it seems impossible to open to the extent that it would be able to open to the 3/5/45/54/5/4 of 4/5 of 400,75 of G, while it would be difficult to see that the movement of the Plaintiff cannot be able to open to the right-hand side.