저작권법위반
Each of the instant public prosecutions is dismissed.
1. A summary of the facts charged is a person who has served as an instructor in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and Defendant B is a corporation operator who operates a private teaching institute on the seventh floor of the building in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si.
A. Defendant A, at around August 2017, at the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. in the 7th floor of Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sung-gu, Seoul, by reproducing three copies of the books “D” written by the victim Quadi Education Corporation without obtaining permission from the copyright holder, and thereby infringing on the victim’s Quadi Educational Corporation’s intellectual property rights.
B. Defendant B, who is an employee of the Defendant at the above time and place, committed the same offense as the above in relation to the Defendant’s business.
2. Determination
(a) Applicable law: Article 136(1)1 and Article 141 of the Copyright Act;
(b) Offenses subject to prosecution: Article 140 of the Copyright Act.
C. Declaration of withdrawal of complaint: Submission of a written withdrawal of complaint by the complainant on April 10, 2018, which was after the institution of this case was indicted.
(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;