However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who engages in assembly of textile machinery, and the victim C (57 Does) who sets up a friend farming house from three to four years before 3 to four years have come to know that he/she had a cover on his/her her her friend field.

From around 17:30 on December 4, 2016 to 19:20, the Defendant drinked alcoholic beverages with the victims, F, and G et al. in E-cafeterias located in Gyeongbuk-do, and then came in front of the H restaurant located at a level of 30 meters away from the above restaurant, the Defendant saw the victim to take a bath to the Defendant, laid down the cigarette to the Defendant, and saw the victim to take the lock to the Defendant’s right side of the victim’s right side by drinking left hand, and caused the victim to take head on the cement floor.

Then, as seen above, the defendant was used on the floor and caused the victim's balth and falth by balthing the balth, and caused the victim's balths by balthing the balth and falth, and caused the victim to leave the balth of the balth of the balth.

As a result, the Defendant, who did not know the number of days of treatment to the victim, caused the injury to the victim's life by adding the ductal leoptysis and the ductal leoptysis, focusing ductal brain damage, and the closure of the ductal duct.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements made to the accused in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Investigation report (on-site photographs of the case);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the violence scene, video CD, and opinion letter;

1. Article 258 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below)

1. At the time of the alleged crime of this case, there was no possibility that the defendant could have predicted the result of injury.

2. The evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court and, in particular, the video images of the fluore video CDs.