A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for one year and six months, respectively.

, however, from the date when this judgment has become final.

1. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of Drinking Measures) around 00:02 on February 21, 2019, the Defendant driving a drinking-free car on the front side of D in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, while driving a drinking-free car on the front side of D, which is located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, and driving two lanes in the middle of the two-lanes from the jurisdiction of the Youngpo Market Intersection, the Defendant was under the control of the joint driving for drinking under the jurisdiction of the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency for the reason that there is a considerable reason to believe that he was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was demanded to drive the vehicle on the front side of D, which is located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for the measurement of drinking alcohol for the reason that there is a considerable reason to recognize that he was under the influence of alcohol due to a

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable reasons.

B. The Defendant of special obstruction of performance of official duties is above.

At the time and place indicated in the port, as above, the victim Gman of Seoul Young-gu Police Station F of the Seoul Young-gu Police Station demanded that the victim take a drinking test by drinking driving, and the victim take the right arms to the inside of the driver's seat, and was under the influence of drinking, but the victim started the speed of the car, thereby hindering the victim's legitimate performance of official duties concerning the drinking control of police officers, by shocking the victim's hand on the left side of the driver's vehicle, which is a dangerous object, even though the victim was under the influence of drinking.

2. Defendant B

A. In order to avoid drinking control, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol at the same time and place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) and driving a HW car, reported that the said A escaped during drinking control, and did not follow the police’s stop instructions, and led the Defendant to be towed by the police officers under the control of the said vehicle, instead of driving the said vehicle.

The defendant is opposed to the one-way road for the purpose of continuing to flee.