However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 19, 2017, the Defendant observed the “C cafeteria” in front of the “C cafeteria” in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about 19:50, and observed the political talks between the victim D (63 tax) and the victim E (62 tax) and the victim E (62 tax). During the dispute between the victims and the horses, the Defendant: (a) had the dicator (70cm in length) who was dangerous goods in the said cafeteria; (b) had the dicator (70cm in length) who followed the victim D; (c) had the face of the said d’s E who met it on his hand; (d) assaulted the victim E by breaking the head of the sat, satch, and other parts of the satch without opening two weeks’ treatment; and (e) had the satch of the d’ E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of each police officer in D or E;

1. A report on dispatch to the scene of a crime under violence;

1. On-site photographs and damaged photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of violence and choice of imprisonment with prison labor) concerning criminal facts;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes as prescribed in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the punishment shall be aggravated within the extent that the sum of the long-term punishments of the above two crimes, which are determined for the heavier special injury);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order and Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. is that the Defendant assaulted the victim D and inflicted bodily injury, and assaulted the victim D with the victim’s speaker (70 centimeters in length) who is a dangerous object, thereby causing serious bodily injury to the victim D through the use of iron agents (70 centimeters in length).

Among the victims, the victims did not agree with E, and the damage was not recovered.

However, the defendant paid 1.5 million won to the victim D in terms of medical expenses and the compensation for the change of damage.

Defendant.