However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A listen to the statement that the person to be jointly and severally guaranteed is necessary while counseling with the nameless brobeer and counseling in order to obtain a loan, and the defendant B accepted it by asking for the joint and several sureties to the defendant B who was aware of the need for joint and several sureties, and the defendant B accepted it. The defendants agreed to make a false statement as if the defendant B was present in D even though he did not have a place of work, to obtain a loan from the victim E, and to prepare and submit a false document as if the defendant B was working in D through the above name bromoer and the above name bromoer to this end.

1. On December 10, 2014, the Defendants forged private documents: (a) in collusion with a person with an infinite name; (b) Defendant B informed Defendant A of his resident registration number and address, which is the information necessary for creating documents related to workplace information; (c) Defendant A informed the person infinite name of his resident registration number and address; (d) Defendant A informed the person inf infinite name of his personal information column; (b) “Name B, resident number: F, address: Gu G in Daegu Metropolitan City: and (e) “affiliated: affiliated agency: office assistant, office assistant, address: and telephone number: I”; and (c) prove that the person infinite was in office as of April 3, 2014 and has been in office until December 9, 2014.

As of December 9, 2014, the “JJ for the president of the D representative director” was written in the column of the Preparation, and the seal forged next to it was cut off in an indefinite manner and completed the certificate of employment.

As a result, the Defendants forged a letter of employment certificate in the name of D representative director, which is a private document on proof of facts for the purpose of exercising the right in collusion with the names of those infinite.

2. The Defendants at the time of the instant investigation document in collusion with the person infinite name, and the person infinite name is not an employee of the said victim who knew of the forgery around December 10, 2014.