However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 17, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the slopeD belonging to the C District Zone of the Seocheon-gu Northern Police Station, the Defendant called up to the effect that the Defendant was seated with the first floor of Btel 1, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, the Defendant’s accommodation, and that he was seated with the same. (b) On April 17, 2018, the Defendant was seated with the same.

In order to ask questions, "I have to go to the Doz. I have to do so, because I have to do so, I have to do so. I have expressed my farb chrop "," I have expressed my farb Doz, I had a slope D's chest part by hand, and had a slope D's chest part by hand go against the wall.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is inferior to the nature of the crime by assaulting a police officer, etc. who was dispatched by the defendant under the influence of alcohol, etc., the defendant's mistake is recognized, there is no record of the same crime, and there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than the fine, and other various sentencing conditions, including the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as the sentence as shown in the Disposition.