전세금반환
1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and the counterclaim by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the judgment is as follows: “Lease contract” in Section 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance; “The defendant has a duty to pay 7 million won to the defendant in compensation for damages, since the delay of delivery by the plaintiff to the non-party union caused 7 million won to be unduly unjust enrichment in the rent of the plaintiff at the time of delivery; “the plaintiff has a duty to pay 7 million won to the defendant in compensation for damages”; “the plaintiff within the time limit” in Section 17; and “the defendant has a difficult condition to continue to maintain until November 30, 2017,” in Sections 5 to 2 to 3 of the judgment of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that “the expiration of the period on September 2017.”
(1) The Plaintiff asserts that the amount of KRW 20 million shall not be included in the lease deposit of this case, as the Plaintiff suffered damage exceeding KRW 1,40,000,00,000, including the cost of electric extension, the cost of electric construction, the cost of employees' rest room, and the cost of installing a dormitory at the time of preparation of the performance assurance as of October 13, 2017, including the cost of attaching KRW 5.6 million and the cost of director's rest room, and KRW 5,60,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).