전자금융거래법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. In light of various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, such as the fact that there is no change of circumstances that may consider the sentencing after the judgment of the court below, and the act of keeping the means of electronic financial transactions, such as the instant crime, is a crime that serves as the basis of other serious crimes, such as Bophishing fraud, and thus requires strict punishment, it does not seem that even if considering the circumstances alleged as the grounds for appeal by the defendant, the sentence against the defendant is too unreasonable and thus, exceeds the reasonable scope of discretion.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.