except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 13, 2014, from around 16:50 to 19:50, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol from Dusb operated by the victim C (V, 54 years of age), expressed the victim’s desire to “hinging, drinking, drinking, seeing, seeing, seeing, seeing, immediately seeing the same youth, and seeing to the same youth,” and prevented the customer from running his/her business for about three hours, such as running away from the time to the customer with a view to breathing the breath of the breath and 3 hours of drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on report on occurrence of accidents;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act);