If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

1. Around March 24, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driving on March 24, 2015, the Defendant driven a approximately 5 km distance from the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s residence to the front of the D Building, the point of control, located in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s residence, without a motorcycle driver’s license.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) around the D building set forth in paragraph (1), the Defendant laid off a portable gasoline in front of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo Military Police Station F District patrol team, and obstructed the legitimate execution of duties of police officials by threateninging the said G with the defect of regulating the Defendant’s suspicion of driving without a driver’s license. One is left away from one another; (b) why is why is why is why you can see; (c) why you can see; (d) how you can see; (e) how you can see; and (e) how you see their arms and shoulders; and (e) how you can see their arms and shoulders in their hand; and (e) how you walk up the instant gasoline that was kept in custody of the obabbba, and (e) those who walk along the oba, interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties by means of intimidation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, subparagraph 2 of Article 154, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of penalties for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and 3, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order [refer to the lowest limit according to the criteria for handling multiple crimes] has no basic area (6-1-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (limited to the scope of recommendations (referring to the lowest limit according to the criteria for handling multiple crimes). [Special person] The decision of sentence] has many records that the defendant was punished as a crime related to violence, drinking, or non-licensed driving.